5. Requirements of postmodern curriculum
Doll replaced traditional “3R” Standard of curriculum (Reading,writing,arithmetic) with “4R” Standard. “4R” refers to richness, recursion, relation and rigor.; Richness refers to depth, level of meaning and multiple possibilities or multiple explanations of a curriculum; recursion means that there is no starting point or end point of a curriculum, and any conclusion of curriculum activity implies a new start; relation indicates internal relations of curriculum structures, and association with cultural view or world outlook beyond curriculum; rigor relates to explanation and uncertainty, namely purposefully seeking various possible options. In our opinion, the transit of modern curriculum to postmodern curriculum shall meet following requirements.
5.1 Systematism
Traditional curriculum emphasizes multiplicity as external force imposed on curriculum, thus harmonious connection between multiplicities is neglected; relations between teachers and students, or between curriculum and teachers & students are regarded as relations between activeness and passiveness; For instance, traditional curriculum emphasizes the content of a single curriculum, but neglects contents of other curriculums; teachers impart knowledge of other subject only if some patents request that students should gain more knowledge, and even new curriculums are established based on the request of society, public and government, otherwise, some curriculums would be continued over the years. Based on the hypotheses of internality or cultivation of Dewey, Piaget, and Toulmin, any change of curriculum is internal reorganization of organism itself or its response to external forces. Postmodern curriculum attaches importance to students’ ability of organization, cultivation and construction which show strong feature of systematism. Modern curriculum belongs to closed system with entirety and target to be determined in advance; such modern curriculum is under rigorous control and emphasizes efficiency, it deals with few variables and enjoys high predictability. Postmodern curriculum belongs to open system, continuously deriving variable materials and energies from external environment as feedback to facilitate internal transformation and renovation. Such postmodern curriculum needs appropriate alteration, chaos, disorder and fault to inspire reorganization of system, encouraging students to establish new organization from chaotic uncertainty by turning fault, opportunity and failure into branch point of experience transformation(Briggs & Peat, 1999).
5.2 Richness
Richness refers to depth, level of meaning and multiple possibilities or multiple explanations of curriculum. Teachers and students shall be encouraged to experience transformation and passive transformation, while curriculum shall bear “proper” uncertainty, abnormality, unavailability, confusion, unbalance, dissipation and vitality. Such proper features couldn’t be decided in advance, but shall be continuously coordinated among teachers, students and texts. Each discipline shall explain ‘richness’ in its own way. It is obvious that richness is on the margin of chaos, which is a kind of uncertainty with irregular emergence of innovative thought; according to Dewey(1971)9, practical thinking is a process and a person can continuously change (p.72)if only he thinks. Therefore, parts of results can be produced, namely curriculums are temporary stops for old ideas and starting points of next thoughts (p.75). Such opinion can be found in currere (Latin word of curriculum) of Pinar10, which regards curriculum as an initiative course, a kind of overall life experience; so according to Pinar ,curriculum isn’t confined to a certain product, plan, textbook, teaching guide, standardized examination and target, etc11(Kincheloe, 1998).
Design of postmodern curriculum indicates uncertainty, since curriculum is a series of texts, people not only keep and create various interactive and inter- challenging texts, but also incorporate their own life experiences in their created texts12(Ornstein & Hunkins, 1998). We continuously deconstruct our world of curriculum, and create new texts from our interaction with texts. Teaching process is no longer implemented through linear transmission, and doesn’t always require clear and exact sectors, but requires circulation, development and dissemination in a significant network which is always changing, incomplete and to be supplemented13.(Cherryholmes,1988). Changing curriculums can continuously produce new connotation. Uncertainty itself has created richness, while richness continuously promotes production of uncertainties.
5.3 Relation
“Relation” has double meanings of “education” and “culture” as to postmodern curriculum. The former can be called “educational relation” indicating large network consisting of concepts in curriculum, text, teacher, student, medium and other factors. One focus of educational relation exists in internal relation of curriculum structures, the depth of which shall be developed through recursive reflection. Curriculum can improve its richness based on reflection. The latter is called “cultural relation”, namely all our explanations not only relate to local culture, and also correlative with other cultures. We shall realize such “cultural relation” to better understand all teaching actions and thoughts of “dialogists” in a teaching process. Only thoughts of dialogists participated in a teaching process are coordinated with cultural background, expected functions of teaching press can be realized.
Scholars insisting on ecological orientation of post modernity claim that postmodern holistic philosophy shall be developed to renovate tragedy of modernity and through education people shall realize: all phenomena involving biology, mentality, society and environment in our living world are interacted with each other, yet not independently. Orr(1992)contended that all education is environment education14(p.90), curriculum shall teach how to care for our earth and ecology to realize its educational effects. Destroying of external natural environment and destroying of man’s internal psychological environment are two aspects of one problem; ecological crisis, waste of or irresponsibility for earth resources reveal the failure of modern knowledge and educational system in moral and civil education. Technically people’s technically introducing some issue of environmental science education couldn’t solve such problem, but fundamentally it is a problem of moral or civil education. Thus it can be seen that relation is not only embodied in curriculum itself, but more importantly embodied in philosophy of entire curriculum that highly emphasize the importance of relation in the system.
5.4 Rigor
“Rigor” under the frame of modernism claims that individual subjectivity shall be removed into objectivity, observability, measurability and operability. Therefore, “rigor” of 20th century emphasizes logic of learning, precision of scientific observance and math. Rigor of postmodern frame is uncertain and explanatory. The presentation of rigor is to overcome nonlinear features emphasized by postmodern curriculum, which might drive curriculum into boundless relativism or exclusionism. Postmodern curriculum is inclined to regard openness and transformation as anti-standardization or non-standardization. In fact, postmodern curriculum replaces precise standards with bounds, i.e., it couldn’t be too early to regard one opinion as correct or final answer to certain problem, but shall apply various opinions to multiple combinations to produce open and creative possible results. Therefore, rigor refers to purposely seeking and exploring different options and their interrelations.
5.5 Emergence from background
Emergence from background indicates internal relations of structures of curriculum content as well as relations between curriculum content and cultural background; postmodern curriculums are established based on richness, uncertainty, relation and systematism, thus knowledge and thinking constantly appear among the entire event and emerge from background. According to Lyotard15(1984), postmodern curriculum contends that there is no dominant narrative or grand narrative; There’s no leading example, either. Curriculum isn’t a single thing, explanation and theory of curriculum aren’t confined to one mode, and curriculum theory isn’t a precise & systematic hypothesis and validation, but is no more than partial conclusion consisting of various language games and foreign components. If we only appealed to certain common or abstract principle, particularity and partial thing of daily life would be denied, various differences would be prohibited by universal violations, and special rights of history would be legalized 16(Aronowitz & Giroux, 1991; Ornstein & Hunkins, 1998).Post modernity has consistent characterization in fighting against the world; no grand narrative or structure can explain our life and world. An entity doesn’t have well-connected stable structure, but always consists of changing fragments. Relations between entity and language as well as speaking manner are changing; meanings aren’t fixed, but concepts are continuously reshaped during discussion and action, and new combination methods of meanings constantly emerge17(Ornstein & Hunkins, 1998)。 These continuously emerged meanings aren’t nameless, but originate from whole curriculum, more particularly, from practice of curriculum.
Conclusions
The main motivation of postmodern curriculum exploration is to adapt such curriculum to the changing society, which aims to eliminate crises of traditional curriculums through practice of curriculum. Postmodern curriculum is one embodiment or one branch of system science or complexity science, which is the product of transformation of peoples’ simple thought to systematic and multiple thought emphasizing relations. Systematic features can also be applied to description of postmodern curriculum. Postmodern curriculum attempts to seek a kind of innovative curriculum in an open background.
References
Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. A. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture and social criticism. University of Minnesota Press. N.Y.:Routledge.
Behar- Horenstein, L. S. (2000). Can the modern view of curriculum be refined by postmodern criticism? In L.S. Behar- Horenstein & J.Glanz (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives (pp.6-33). London: Bergin & Garvey.
Briggs, J. & Peat, F. D. (1999). Seven life lessons of chaos: Timeless wisdom from the science of change. N. Y.: Harper Collins Publishers.
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism:Poststructural investigations in education. N. Y.: Teachers College.
Dewey, J. (1971). How we think. Chicago: Henry Regnery. (Original work published 1993).
Doll, W. E. (1989). Foundations of a post-modern curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(3), 243-253.
Kincheloe, J. (1998). Pinar’s Currere and Identity in Hyperreality: Grounding the Post-formal Nation of Intrapersonal Intelligence. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum toward new identities (pp.129-142). London & N. Y.: Garland.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). Postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota University.
Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F. P. (1998). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy—Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: Suny Press.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. & Taubman, P. M. (2005). Understanding Curriculum: An introduction to study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. N.Y.: Peter Lang .
Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. N.Y.: Garland.
Thomas, T. P. & Schubert, W. H. (1997) Recent curriculum theory: Proposals for understanding, critical praxis, inquiry and expansion. Educational Theory, 47 (2), 261-285.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Resource: http://www.isnare.com/?aid=370110&ca=Education